unjust enrichment

Either way, they do not arise in response to unjust enrichment.

Lord Wright said the claim was based on unjust enrichment.

But this was not a case of unjust enrichment.

Unjust enrichment is a developed and coherent field in continental civil law systems.

Such a defence is closely linked with unjust enrichment, and has limitations.

Claims in unjust enrichment do not depend upon proof of any wrong.

The focus upon the offender's unjust enrichment is also questionable for two reasons.

"Knowledge is immaterial under the law of unjust enrichment," the judge wrote.

This is seen important for the question of what response, personal or proprietary, may come from a claim in unjust enrichment.

At common law, a claim based on unjust enrichment can be submitted to five stages of analysis.

An action for unjust enrichment is available (Book 6, Art.

To prevent unjust enrichment, the Court substituted an award of £1800.

It is one of the leading cases in the area and in English unjust enrichment law.

A claim based on unjust enrichment always results in an obligation to make restitution.

In the present case, the concept of unjust enrichment suggests that the plaintiffs should have a remedy.

The main remedy if any of the trust purposes should fail would be through Unjust enrichment.

Hence illegality is raises important questions for English unjust enrichment law.

The lawsuit includes claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment.

Fourth, and important in practice to prevent unjust enrichment is that counter-restitution must be possible.

In my judgment, this is the paradigm of a case of unjust enrichment.

'This is not based upon unjust enrichment except in the most trivial sense of that expression.

A court may order wrongdoers to pay back illegal profits, with interest, to prevent unjust enrichment.

Traditionally, work on unjust enrichment has been dealt with under the title of "restitution".

Promissory estoppel or unjust enrichment may be available, but generally are not.

Any clause which explicitly provides for unjust enrichment is considered unlawful at common law.